All categories

3 years ago

What strategies should a direct response message use? Check all that apply.

Business

1 answer:

sdas [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A", "B", "C", and "D".

Explanation:

Direct response messaging aims to provide customers with a clear response to a claim or concern they have. First, the letter is replied with the same subject of the previous correspondence to demonstrate the case is being followed. Then, all <em>relevant information is provided at the beginning </em>of the letter. The <em>questions or doubts of the customer must be answered in the order asked</em>. If necessary, <em>graphics can be used to help customers understand easier</em>. Finally, <em>the letter must have a forward-looking statement in the closing</em> showing willingness to provide further help if needed.

You might be interested in

On March 1, Terrell & Associates provides legal services to Whole Grain Bakery regarding some recent food poisoning complain

zzz [600]

Answer:

March 1

Dr Notes Receivable $10,900

Cr Service Revenue $10,900

September 1

Dr Cash $11,390

Cr Notes Receivable $ 10,900

Cr Interest Revenue $490

Explanation:

March 1

Dr Notes Receivable $10,900

Cr Service Revenue $10,900

(Provide legal services and accept note)

September 1

Dr Cash $11,390

Cr Notes Receivable $ 10,900

Cr Interest Revenue $490

(Receive cash on note receivable and interest)

(Interest revenue = $10,900 x 9% x 6/12) =490.5

6 0

3 years ago

Give description of a recent (2019-2021)example of how this problem has displayed in Southafrica

Gemiola [76]

South africa’s is a cool place,

7 0

2 years ago

The cob Douglas production function is given by Q(K,L)=AK^1.4*L^1.6

Alexeev081 [22]

Part a) The Cob Douglas production function is given as:

$Q(K,L)=AK^{1.4} L^ {1.6 } .$

To show that this function is homogeneous with degree 3, we introduce be a parameter, t.

$Q(tK,tL)=A(tK)^{1.4} (tL)^ {1.6 } .$

Using properties of exponents, we on tinder:

$Q(tK,tL)=At^{1.4}K^{1.4} t^ {1.6 }L^ {1.6 } .$

This implies that:

$Q(tK,tL)=t^{1.4} \times t^ {1.6 }(AK^{1.4} L^ {1.6 } )$

$Q(tK,tL)=t^{1.4 + 1.6}(AK^{1.4} L^ {1.6 } )$

Simplify the exponent of t to get;

$Q(tK,tL)=t^{3}(AK^{1.4} L^ {1.6 } )$

Hence the function is homogeneous with degree, 3

Part b) To verify Euler's Theorem, we must show that:

$K\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: K}+L\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: L}=3AK^{1.4}L^{1.6}$

Verifying from the left:

$K\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: K}+L\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: L} =K(1.4AK^{0.4} L^{1.6}) + L(1.6AK^{1.4} L^{0.6})$

$K\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: K}+L\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: L} =1.4(AK^{1.4} L^{1.6}) + 1.6(AK^{1.4} L^{1.6})$

$K\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: K}+L\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: L} =(1.4 + 1.6)(AK^{1.4} L^{1.6})$

$K\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: K}+L\frac{\partial Q}{\partial \: L} =3(AK^{1.4} L^{1.6})$

Q•E•D

8 0

3 years ago

Which factors may influence a company's choice of inventory cost flow assumption?

Oxana [17]

inventory cost flow assumption influence by tax implications of choice ,financial statement effect, actual physical flow of inventory.

The way or channel that costs move through a company is referred to as the flow of costs. The flow of costs typically pertains to manufacturing businesses where accountants are required to quantify expenses associated with raw materials, work in progress, finished goods inventory, and cost of goods sold.

Four commonly acknowledged methods—specific cost, average cost, first-in, first-out (FIFO), and last-in, first-out—are available for allocating expenses to ending inventory and cost of goods sold (LIFO).

To know more about Cost Flow visit:

brainly.com/question/13621345

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

James Sebenius, in his Harvard Business Review article: Six Habits of Merely Effective Negotiators, identifies six mistakes that

PolarNik [594]

Answer:

c. Neglecting the Other Side’s Problems.

Explanation:

To be an effective negotiator one must understand what his interest is and what he can compromise and the limits to what can be given to the other party (that is no-deal options).

It is even more important to understand the other parties problem. This can be used to guage their interest and how it can be met.

Not considering the counterparty problem is a mistake the negotiating team have made. If the other partie's problem is not understood then there won't be an effective way of negotiating.

3 0

3 years ago