Answer:
When using judicial restraint, a judge will usually defer to the decisions of the elected branches of government.
Explanation:
The theory by which the powers of the judges are restricted and limited to strike down the laws is said to be judicial restraint. Judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint. The unconstitutional laws are subjected to be stroked down by the judges. The judicial restraint curtails the power of the judges unless the laws are unconstitutional.
Answer:
c. the war powers resolution of 1973, which aimed to give congress more say in whether us troops were deployed abroad
Explanation:
Arthur Schlesinger, The Imperial Presidency, 1973 was a criticism of the constitution not working as it should, where he believed that the executive branch has too much power in implementing various degree of policy such as foreign policy. Under the Imperilled Presidency he is of the opinion that Congress should be more effective in it oversight as clearly stated in the constitution.
Arthur Schlesinger would most likely support the War Powers Resolution of 1973 which was designed to limit the U.S. president's ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad restricting.
First of all, there is no reason to charge the wife - she is not doing anything wrong.
Also, it would not be a homicide, unless he kills his wife.
It is also not negligence, since he is actively abusing her.
So the correct answer is:
a. When the husband is charged, the case would be a criminal case.
<span>Jerome operates under heteronomous morality while Hani is operating under autonomous morality. Under Jerome's schema, the outcome of the action and the rules of the world determine the morality of an action, without understanding the intentions or the mitigating factors that might be at play. Autonomous morality, however, sees that there are shades of grey to every situation and that morality does not always require a punishment for every action or transgression.</span>
