The work breakdown structure provides a basis for creating the project schedule and performing earned value management for measuring and forecasting project performance. A work breakdown structure is also known as WBS- which helps break down the team's work into smaller, more manageable sections. By breaking down the sections into smaller groups gives more opportunity for completion before moving on to the next group and makes the tasks more managable.
Answer:
Product Cost Variable Or fixed Direct or indirect
1. Rubber core for soccer ball Variable Direct
2. Thread to hold leather together Variable Indirect
3. Taxes on factory Fixed Indirect
4. Wages on Assembly workers Variable Direct
5. Machinery depreciation Fixed Indirect
6. Annual flat fees paid for office security Fixed Indirect
7. Leather cover for soccer balls Variable
Answer:
3,000 $100 bills equivalent to $300,000
Explanation:
The economic order quantity (EOQ) is the optimum quantity of a good to be purchased or required at a time in order to minimize ordering and carrying costs in inventory.
EOQ = the square root of [(2 times the annual demand in units times the incremental cost to process an order) divided by (the incremental annual cost to carry one unit in inventory)]
- annual demand in units = 12,500 x 12 = 150,000
- incremental costs to process an order = $300
- incremental annual cost to carry one unit in inventory = 10% x 100 = $10
EOQ = √[(2 x 150,000 x $300) / $10] = √($90,000,000 / $10) = √9,000,000 = 3,000 bills
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
