Answer:
A) is maximizing her total utility from the given fixed budget.
Explanation:
The equal marginal principle refers to the principle in which the consumer would select that combination of goods which maximise its total utility. It could be selected by having marginal utility and its price
And for profit maximization, the marginal utility and the price is equivalent to both the goods.
i.e
30 = 30
Hence, the correct option is a.
Answer:
okay lol
Explanation:
answer my newest question and i'll give it to you <3
rabbits have large ears so that they can hear predators coming so they will run and stay alive
Answer: Total cost (23500 hours predicted ) = $ 484625
Explanation:
The question is incomplete the high and low methods requires us to use high and low level of activity together with the corresponding total costs at each level to determine the variable cost per unit. we will provide assumed total costs and nursing hours in order to show how high and low method is used to predict total costs for the next period.
Assume the following were total costs and corresponding nursing hours for the previous 3 months
Total cost Hours
$560000 30000 hours
$400000 220000 hours
$225000 10000 hours
calculating Variable cost using high and low method
Variable cost per unit = (high cost - low cost)/high hour - low hours)
Variable Cost Per unit = (840000 - 225000)/ (30000 - 10000) = 16.75
Variable cost per unit = $ 16.75
Fixed costs = 560000 - (28000 x 16.75) = 560000 - 469000
Fixed costs = $91000
Total cost (23500 hours predicted ) =Total Fixed cost + Total Variable costs
Total cost (23500 hours predicted ) = $91000 + (23500 x $16.75)
Total cost (23500 hours predicted ) == $91000 + $393625
Total cost (23500 hours predicted ) = $ 484625
Answer:
-9.92%
Explanation:
P₀ = Div₁ / (Re - g)
- Div₁ = next year's expected dividend = $1.12 x (1 - 11.5%) = $0.9912
- Re = cost of equity = ?
- P₀ = current stock price = $62.91
- g = dividend's growth rate = -11.5%
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Re = ($0.9912 / $62.91) - 11.5%
Re = 1.58% - 11.5% = -9.92%
Since the cost of equity or required rate of return cannot be negative, I suppose that investors are not worried about Abbott distributing dividends, instead, they prefer that the company reinvests earnings in new projects.
