The conflict, fought between June and October 1877, stemmed from the refusal of several bands of the Nez Perce, dubbed "non-treaty Indians," to give up their ancestral lands in the Pacific Northwest and move to an Indian reservation in Idaho.
Answer: It killed alot of people & reduced the influence of the Catholic Church.
Explanation:
Anti-Federalists
- wanted a Bill of Rights in the Constitution
- did not like that the national government could have an army during peacetime
- policies favored farmers, artisans, and skilled workers
- did not approve of the necessary and proper clause (it gave too much power to the national government)
- feared a strong Executive branch would lead to a monarchy
- people must actively participate in order to have a free government
In order to fill the speech bubbles with an argument for each proposal, we must first understand a little more about the argumentation process, which must contain a specific reason for your ideas, such as a criticism and concrete facts.
Now let's create at least one argument for each following proposal:
<h3>Delegate who believes the nation should have a single executive:</h3>
We believe that the nation should be led by a single executive, that is, by a single supreme leader, who is the president of the republic, in order to generate greater compliance, speed in processes and a leadership figure before the people.
<h3>Delegate who believes the nation should have a three-member executive:</h3>
The dissolution of the single power of the chief executive into three members will create a greater sense of democracy in the essential choices for the nation, reduce the totalitarianism with which the president can present himself and increase international relations.
Therefore, to create a persuasive argument, it is necessary to adopt a discourse focused on ideas that generate benefits, solve problems and a fact-based way.
Find out more information about argumentation here:
brainly.com/question/3775579
