1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
2 years ago
10

What is your position on cloning humans?

English
1 answer:
Anna [14]2 years ago
7 0
Hmm.. That would be cool but quite dangerous. If you think about it, we could send them to war instead of our troops, saving thousands of lives. 
You might be interested in
Imma have aged milk with pureed tomatoes and the finest beef on toasted bread for lunch.
yanalaym [24]

Explanation:

are u not asking questions

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is likewise most lamentable to think, how in taking Negros out of Africa, and selling of them here, That which GOD has joined
Kazeer [188]

Answer: If I’m not mistaken; Sewall quotes Matthew 19:6 from the Bible to argue that all humans are equal in the eyes of God, hence slavery is immoral.

Explanation:

Sewall was a well documented abolitionists who unlike many argued, as evident in this passage, that all humans are equal. he does this using the biblical reference stating the same as well as the concept of Redemption.

By saying that the black people from Africa are redeemable, he urges the Christians to think of them in the same purview they think of their fellow man from. the possibility of redeeming the slaves with christian faith is presented by him as a way of elevating them from their plight. Using the Bible, he is also able to argue that the condition of the saves and the black people from Africa can be the fault of white people.

8 0
2 years ago
Only right answer no spammers​
natita [175]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Do it yourself. I'm not gonna write a 100 word essay for you because you can't simply look at an image and describe it.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is indirect characterization?
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

revealing character traits through speech, thoughts, and actions

Explanation:

Indirect characterization is when the author does not tell you about the traits of a character directly, instead implying characteristics through what they do and think.

7 0
2 years ago
Can some one help me with this English assignment i'll give 25 points.<br> thanks
tester [92]

A.

It is a first-person voice, which can be seen on the use of first-person pronouns from the beginning through the end.

B.

The speaker presents as civillian and the poem adresses a soldier. This can be seen both in the poem and in the title of it.

C.

Not only tries to conserve the same rhythm and meter by linking the end of a verse with the following, it also emphasizes a phrase or word and shows the relation of the phrase or word to what has gone before (almost like sentence diagramming). This adds richness to the poem and its images, like in the first indentation between ‘quarrel’ and ‘stood still’.

D.

That image of shooting but shooting ‘goods’, food and comfort, produces an effect of surprise, of slight shock due to the inversion: in this case, the civillian does the shooting, not the soldier. The image is unexpected, but it also further describes this civillian by describing the items that are going to be shot: items that are tied to life, they can prolonge life (it’s food) and not end it, like bullets.

E.

The question poised at the end can be read as being ‘shot’ by the civillian to both the soldier and also the reader. The question proposes a reflection about war, about what is the purpose or intent of it, what is the ulterior meaning behind it. Can a soldier find meaning on it? Can a civillian do it? The decision of ending with a question ties to this idea of keeping the poem open and alive in the memory of its readers, instead of a firm or concrete affimartion.

F.

The poet finds war to be something incomprehensible, something that doesn’t make sense or have a real meaning behind it. It’s senseless, it is “impartial death”, “confusion” and incomprehensible to both the civillians and the soldiers. While the poet has this attitude about war, it shows empathy and consideration for the soldier, for its “plight”, as one can see at the end. The poet has hope and wants the soldier (and the reader by extent) to reflect on war, to form a sort of empathy link with the civillian(s).

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a subordinating juntion
    10·1 answer
  • What important detail about Krebs’s sisters and mother is revealed?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the Falling Action and the Theme of the short story, "The Trombone."
    8·1 answer
  • What can be made in the field or in the laboratory ?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the American dream change throughout the 20th century?
    14·1 answer
  • What is goldings attitude towards piggy
    11·1 answer
  • 7. Which sentence is written correctly? *
    5·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast 4 paragraphs on the story the postmaster and a warriors daughter. Message me so it won’t be plagiarized
    13·1 answer
  • What does it mean if someone says ..” I don’t have anybody else.” ?
    6·2 answers
  • Part A
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!