Answer:
Yes, the Keynesian economists would favor this action.
Explanation:
Keynesians argue that in times of recession, the aggregate demand should be increased through government policies so that the economy recovers and output increases. The policy by Bush government put more money in the hands of people and as such their purchasing power increased. This increase in purchasing power would lead to an increase in aggregate demand according to the Keynesians.
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
For accepting the payment by credit card or by debit card, the online merchant i.e online seller by whom the individual buys the products online.
The online merchant has an agreement with the merchant account and the bank or financial institution so that the individual can able to pay the amount through online mode to the online merchant and in the same time, the amount is deducted from the individual bank account after placing the order
Answer:
A) $38,650; 48.31%
Explanation:
The computation of the contribution margin and the contribution margin ratio is shown below:
Contribution margin = Service Revenue - Cleaning Supplies Used - wages expense
= $80,000 - $22,000 - $19,350
= $38,650
The variable cost is Cleaning Supplies Used + wages expense
And, the contribution margin ratio equals to
= (Contribution margin ÷ sales) × 100
= ($38,650 ÷ $80,000) × 100
= 48.31%
The answer to this question is that it is an example of
regulatory capture.
<span>Regulatory capture is a situation where in the interest of
the business or firm is being prioritized by the firm in order for them to
advance and succeed. There are two types of regulatory capture; a materialistic
capture and non-materialistic capture.</span>
