1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qaws [65]
4 years ago
14

An inspector knows that exactly one of 3 suspects committed a crime, and interviews them to find out which. Each person lies in

one of his statements, and tells the truth in the other. A says: I did not do it. B did it. B says: I did not do it. I know that C did it. C says: I did not do it. B does not know who it was. a) Find out who committed the crime; b) Convert the puzzle into a propositional proof (first create the propositional signature and then construct the premises); c) Prove your conclusion in a) using natural deduction.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alla [95]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Here's an accurate explanation as to why C is the correct answer:

A condition of the puzzle is that each person MUST make one statement that is false, and one that is true.

Start with suspect A: If the statement "B did it" is true, then A's other statement "I did not do it" must also be true. Since that does not meet the one true statement, one false statement condition, the statement "B did it" must be FALSE, meaning that A's statement "I did not do it" is TRUE.

On to suspect B: If the statement "I know that C did it" is true, then B's other statement "I did not do it" must also be true. Since that also does not meet the one true statement, one false statement condition, the statement "I know that C did it" must be FALSE, meaning that B's statement "I did not do it" is TRUE.

So if A and B did not do it, C did.

This perfectly harmonizes with C's statements: "I did not do it" (FALSE), and "B does not know who it was" (TRUE, as we determined that B's statement "I know that C did it" was false).

You might be interested in
Michael's boss tells him to report to work at 4:00 a.m. the next day. Michael is not happy about arriving at work at such an unu
Sonja [21]

Answer:

The correct answer would be, Obedience to Authority.

Explanation:

Michael has some work which he needs to get done as soon as possible. To do the task, Michael's boss tells him to report at 4 in the Morning. The usual timing to go to the office is 9 AM to 5 PM. So Michael is really not happy about arriving to the job at this unusual timing told by his boss. But after all the unhappiness, Michael arrives at 4 in the morning the next day. So in the context of Social Influence, the behavior of Michael is an example of the Obedience of Authority, which means, he is obeying the order given to him by his boss who has the authority to dictate him the way he likes.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"Under a ________, the grantor is held legally responsible to the grantee for the condition of the title. However, this type of
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

warranty deed

Explanation:

"Under a warranty deed, the grantor is held legally responsible to the grantee for the condition of the title. However, this type of deed is seldom used in California, because sellers in California are very reluctant to assume this much responsibility and liability."  In the property matters,Warranty deed proved protection to the purchaser and the parties involved in warranty deeds are owner or seller of the property and the buyer.On legal terms owner is known as grantor and buyer to be grantee.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hi! Can you please help me?
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

commander in chief

civil of state

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which term refers to the trend of corporations to methodically expand their worldwide business​ activities?.
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

Internalization

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Interstate Highways in the Southeastern United States
Lorico [155]

A negative externality that might arise as a result of four new major highways being added from north to south is Rise in air pollution.

<h3>What is a negative externality?</h3>

A negative externality refers to an adverse effect that a third party experiences even though they were not involved in the initial transaction that produced the effect.

Air pollution is a negative externality because the people around those highways will be affected by it even if they do not own any of the cars that will ply the four new major highways.

In conclusion, option C is correct.

Find out more on negative externalities at brainly.com/question/13901028

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assessment<br>a. Summarize what you have learnt in five bullet points.​
    13·2 answers
  • Can u PLZZ help me with the first and second question the subject is s.s
    5·1 answer
  • What was one important similarity between Plato and Aristotle ? What was one major difference<br>
    5·1 answer
  • Identify at least two arguments for and two agruments against the new deal
    8·1 answer
  • What were james cook's official and secret orders
    7·1 answer
  • Ann's team completed the first draft of a group document and asked her to edit it carefully for grammar, punctuation, and spelli
    9·1 answer
  • A minority group has less/fewer of what than a dominant group?
    6·1 answer
  • There are approximately how many people in the world today?
    5·2 answers
  • Who founded the National Youth Service Corps and who is or was the founder ​
    14·1 answer
  • Marcus helps Juanita pick up some books she dropped. You think that Marcus must have been in a good mood. According to attributi
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!