The equation describes a function whose maximum value is 5. The data set describes a function whose maximum value is also 5. Comparing the maximum values, we must conclude ...
... It is the same for both functions.
_____
Please note that the premise is that g(x) is a quadratic function. It is definitely NOT a quadratic function in the usual sense of the term.
Expressions equivalent to 3(1+x)+7 is x+10
Answer: Tom will pay $20.01 lesser than the original price.
Step-by-step explanation:
The original price of the phone is $137.99. It is now on sale for 1/10 off the original price. This means that the discount on the original price is 1/10 × 137.99 = 13.799. The new price will be the original price - the discount.
The new price is 137.99 - 13.799 = $124.191
Tom has a coupon for an extra 5% off the sale price. It means that Tom would pay 5% off $124.191. The amount that Tom would pay will be
124.191 - (5/100 × 124.191) = 124.191 - 6.20955 = $117.98
The difference between the original price and the price that Tom will pay is
137.99 - 117.98 = $20.01
The problem deals with fractions comparison, lets do it:
21/30 > 2/3
we begin solving:
21 > (2/3)*30
21 > 2*10
<span>21 > 20
</span>therefore the proposed inequality is true, <span>21/30 > 2/3
You can solve as well getting same denominator for both fractions and comparing directly, in this case we need to get 2/3 to be divided by 30:
2/3 = (10/10)(2/3) = 20/30
So we have:
</span><span>21/30 > 2/3
</span>which is equal to:
<span>21/30 > 20/30
</span>and we compare directly because both fractions are divided by the same number, and we can see that the inequality is true.
I think it’s 7 Becuase the Ae and DE are congruent
