Answer:
d. interviewer’s clothing
Explanation:
A prepared talk where one person asks questions and other people answers is called An interview. In other words, an interview is a situation where someone serves as the interviewer and the other as the interviewee.
A chat that occurs between someone who applied for a job and the spokesperson of a business that is being done to determine whether the candidate is capable of working is called Job interview.
In a condition where Gina induces Hugh to enter into a contract for the purchase of a condominium about which Gina knowingly misrepresents a number of material features, Hugh can rescind from entering into the contract on the basis of fraud when he discovers about the truth of Gina's wrongful intentions.
<h3>What is the significance of a fraud?</h3>
A fraud can be referred to or considered as a situation that arises when either of the parties to a contract is unaware of the wrongful intentions of the other party at the time of entering into the contract.
Therefore, the significance regarding a fraud has been aforementioned.
Learn more about a fraud here:
brainly.com/question/12285524
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. credit to notes payable
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the Equipment which cost the amount of $16000 was purchased by paying the amount of $4000 as cash which means that if the company sign a NOTE PAYABLE for the remainder. The journal entry should include a: CREDIT TO NOTES PAYABLE
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option D.
Explanation:
- The theory or hypothesis that even as soon as it arrives, all institutional investors obtain as well as act on most of the necessary information or data. Even if this was purely real, there would have been no stronger investing strategy than just a coin flip.
- As per this principle, the dynamically trading share prices in such a competitive market don't vary from actual measured value or beliefs.
The other choices have no relation to the given circumstance. So choice D is the correct answer to the above.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, Robin would need to pay because she knew that Ted was not licensed and still decided to hire him. Therefore, agreeing to contract Ted and pay him for the work that he has done. Regardless of whether or not Ted's job was legal or not Robin still agreed and must pay Ted. Ted will later have to deal with his own legal issues but that does not affect the contract that was agreed upon by both parties.