1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
3 years ago
9

Saffron and Serge have a mobile home in which they travel from city to city, town to town, selling pottery and playing music. On

e week they may be in Berkeley, the next Sacramento. The couple travel wherever their mobile home will take them. Which of the following is true?A. By the definition of the California Health and Safety Code, this couple's 'mobile home' is not, in fact, a mobile home.B. The mobile home can be sold by a real estate licensee as real property, since it constitutes a dwelling unit.C. To become real property, their mobile home must have a permanent foundation.D. Saffron and Serge cannot legally occupy the mobile home without a Certificate of Occupancy.
Social Studies
1 answer:
ad-work [718]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C). To become real property, their mobile home must have a permanent foundation.

Explanation:

A general property or possessions are considered to be real property when it is permanently attached to land or real estate property.

As per the question, option C displays a true claim as it correctly describes that 'to become real property, the mobile phones of them must have a permanent foundation.' Thus, the above statement correctly states that in order to make the mobile phones or any other property similar to it as real property, it is required to be attached to permanent property like 'land, building, etc. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
Question / OT
Nikolay [14]
C. They had no rights under the law
4 0
2 years ago
A town engineer comes to the city council with a proposal to install a traffic light at a certain intersection that currently ha
Leona [35]

Answer: The city council should careful evaluate the benefits of reduced fatalities against the costs of the light and the extra time that the drivers will spend waiting for a green light

Explanation: Installing the traffic light which could reduce the fatalities caused on the highway is a good development. However, there are more factors to be considered when embarking on projects of such nature. The projected cost of a project is just as important as the project to itself. It project cost is so high such that the community does not have the required fund to cater for it, then the project should be delayed or altered for a subordinate solution until funds become available.

The extra time require to wait for a green light, if the commuters cannot be patient enough to follow traffic signals, the effort won't reap the required outcome.

3 0
3 years ago
Because the american colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups,
Sliva [168]

Answer:

b. social distinctions were more blurred than in europe.

Explanation:

<u>British taxes practically caused the revolution of the colonies</u>, therefore option "A" is not the correct answer.

That various religious and ethnic groups coexisted in the American colonies was no reason for colonists to tend to support British royalty (D).<em> In fact, diversity and immigration were one of the reasons why the thirteen colonies flourished so quickly.</em>

The colonists didn´t feel that British royalty did anything for them as they had to survive on their own, dedicating themselves mainly to agriculture. <u>The difference in wealth between the inhabitants of England and the colonists was very large, therefore the colonists did not feel entitled to the rights of English citizens (C). Not because the American colonies had a great diversity of religious and ethnic groups.</u>

Because the American colonies were home to diverse religious and ethnic groups, social distinctions were more blurred than in Europe (B). In New England, diversity was ironically the point in common that its inhabitants had and that would lead them to fight for their independence.

7 0
3 years ago
A boss gives her employee a list of seven tasks to complete within the week. The employee makes a list of the most important tas
satela [25.4K]
Plan for time management
3 0
3 years ago
If the Union lost the battle of Gettysburg, how might the overall outcome of the Civil war have changed?
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

The battle of gettysburg was the turning point in the civil war. The south appeared to be winning the war and the north looked like it was close to surrendering. If the Union had lost, they would have ended their chance at winning the civil war. That could mean that if the battle was different, potentially there could still be slavery today.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What education do you need to be a movie director?
    5·1 answer
  • What does this passage say about Byzantine architecture and art? Byzantine works have influenced art and architecture throughout
    5·2 answers
  • What are some of the difficulties with measuring the volume of a gas? Select all that apply.
    9·1 answer
  • Before he can study, Rashid must arrange his books, pencils, paper, and other items on his desk in a particular way. The campus
    12·2 answers
  • Jack really wanted a date with Lacey, so he made sure to consider what had worked for him in the past when asking for a date. He
    14·1 answer
  • 3 social characteristics of an old person ​
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following identifies two of the causes of the War of 1812? A. William Henry Harrison led American soldiers against
    5·1 answer
  • Answer a b and c I need this done today
    7·1 answer
  • Explain in short how computer virus spreads​
    10·2 answers
  • What is the primary purpose of the Supremacy Clause?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!