<span>The answer is a Ziggurat. Sumerian's built massive stepped towers on which were built temples dedicated to the chief god or goddess of a Sumerian city. One example of an ziggurat is the Marduk ziggurat, of Etemenanki, from ancient Babylon.</span>
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
Answer:
C. an agreement between the Five Nations
Answer and Explanation:
Mahabharata says that royalty is necessary to create a sense of belonging to the people, in addition to creating religious and civil unity in a territory. This is because royalty determines the rules to be followed to create the organization of the society, in addition to representing a religion that must be followed and promoting faith and hope for its people. This kind of importance can also be seen in Egyptian royalty, with the difference that in Egypt, royalty did not represent a religion, but was seen as the very god of his people. An author who decides to tell this story, seeks to show readers how royalty can have different meanings in different cultures and regions.
