This is election day. When American citizens vote
Could you imagine being punished for a speech made outside of school. On February 24, 1969, the U.S. supreme court established a new rule allowing free speech and political rights in school settings. Today, many schools are preventing kids from expressing their views and opinions. Doing this breaks students right to freedom of speech and right granted to all equally. So should schools really be punishing students for a speech made outside of school? The answer to that is no.
Answer:
Colonialism's impacts include environmental degradation, the spread of disease, economic instability, ethnic rivalries, and human rights violations—issues that can long outlast one group's colonial rule. More taxes... Britain had got into a lot of debt after the war--since wars are expensive-- and they came up with the great idea of heavily taxing the colonies in order to make up for the money, More regulations, More restrictions
The correct answer is deadly governmental "purging".
Examples for this are: Holocaust - the systematic extermination of Jews and Roma in Germany and the territories occupied by them, and the killings of Jews in other places, such as the Soviet Union.(less known, but also happened)
Answer:
The major difference between these two systems is that in a Presidential system, the executive leader, the President, is directly voted upon by the people (Or via a body elected specifically for the purpose of electing the president, and no other purpose), and the executive leader of the Parliamentary system, the Prime Minister, is elected from the legislative branch directly. In the Presidential System, it is more difficult to enact legislation, especially in the event that the President has different beliefs than the legislative body. The President only responds to the people, the legislative branch can't really do anything to threaten the President. As a result, he can make it more difficult for the legislative body to do anything. In the Parliamentary system, if the Parliament doesn't like the Prime Minister, they can cast a vote of no confidence and replace him. This tends to make the executive leader subservient to the Parliament. Bottom line is, if you believe that government should have more checks and balances, then a Presidential system will give you that. If you believe that it should have the power to enact laws quickly, then you should go for a Parliamentary system.
