Answer: True
Explanation:
Decision regarding an asset replacement is usually based on both the internal rate of return and the net present value of the incremental cash flows.
Therefore, it should be noted that this brings about the complications when comparing the development of relevant cash flows to the expansion decisions.
Answer:
Yeah, her argument will be good in Aceves. The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The promissory clause applies to just the requirement that although no attorney seems to be legal, a commitment is actionable. This happens whenever the Promiser already made that commitment to something like the Promisee who performs mostly on commitment.
- Aceves having operated throughout the specific situation mostly on the foundation of the Bank's commitment or withdrew its complaint. Therefore in this circumstance, the essential requirement that perhaps the promisee would have focused mostly on promiser is accomplished.
- Consecration of promise to pay estoppels is founded on either the ideals of equity as well as justice. The lender's action was unreasonable to Aceves and because of that, the premise would be effective on either the bank as to when the applicant was working on a pledge basis. Thus Aceves will be accurate in her argument.
Answer: $86700
Explanation:
The net operating income is used in knowing the profitability of an investment. The net operating income is gotten by subtracting the expenses from the revenue.
Based on the information given in the question, the net operating income is $86700. Kindly check the attachment for further details.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Improperly packed by the party shipping them.
Explanation:
Carriers are liable for the loss of goods being transported by them under three scenarios: acts of God (<em>because they are unpredictable</em>), acts of the shipper (<em>negligence of the person providing with the goods being transported</em>), and acts of a public enemy (<em>a country engaging into the war</em>).
In that case, <em>the carrier is likely not to be found liable if the shipping items were incorrectly packaged the sending party</em>.
Answer:
D) $31.
Explanation:
The computation of the predetermined overhead rate is shown below:
Predetermined overhead rate = Estimated manufacturing overhead ÷ estimated direct labor hours
where,
Estimated manufacturing overhead is
= Salary of factory supervisor + Heating and lighting costs for factory + Depreciation on factory equipment
= $37,600 + $22,000 + $5,600
= $65,200
And, the direct labor hours is 2,100
So, the predetermined overhead rate is
= $65,200 ÷ 2,100
= $31
