Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
A few months after birth or a year, seeing as twins can get so close within those few months and develop separation anxiety from their twin
Answer:
The correct answers would be Continuous and Partial.
Explanation:
A trainer wants a pigeon to quickly learn to peck a button to obtain food. She also wants to be sure the behavior is resistant to extinction. So she should use Continuous Reinforcement until the response is mastered followed by Partial Reinforcement.
Continuous reinforcement is the reinforcement of behavior each time it occurs, whereas partial reinforcement is when the behavior is reinforced only some times.
Because the trainer wants to be sure that the behavior is resistant to extinction, so to make it interesting, she should use continuous reinforcement until the pigeon is trained, and then partial reinforcement should be used to keep the interest.
Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that __________. have few concrete applications, have almost no critics or challengers, use outdated forms of reasoning
The answer is not supplied in the choices you gave. The answer is "have many variations". Utilitarianism and consequentialism more broadly are ethical theories that have many variations.
