Joseph Stalin came to rule after the death of lenins Death in 1924,He rose to become the leader of the Soviet Union.
The purpose of examples are to help your teacher reinforce, personalize, and clarify ideas so these<u> are all correct. </u>
<h3>Purpose of examples </h3>
- They clarify the idea by giving a scenario where the idea is applied.
- They reinforce the idea by relating it to a scenario that allows easy remembrance.
They also personalize ideas when they relate the scenario to a relevant event that allows for the listeners to understand the idea better.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on clarifying ideas at brainly.com/question/2224789.
Laissez-faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to make the decisions.
This style should be used when
1. When team members have the skills to succeed. Laissez-faire leadership can be effective in situations where group members are highly skilled, motivated, and capable of working on their own. Since these group members are experts and have the knowledge and skills to work independently, they are capable of accomplishing tasks with very little guidance.
2. When group members are experts. The delegative style can be particularly effective in situations where group members are actually more knowledgeable than the group's leader. Because team members are the experts in a particular area, the laissez-faire style allows them to demonstrate their deep knowledge and skill surrounding that particular subject.
3. When independence is valued. This autonomy can be freeing to some group members and help them feel more satisfied with their work. The laissez-faire style can be used in situations where followers have a high-level of passion and intrinsic motivation for their work.
Answer:
It breaks the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment is about the right for privacy and freedom, and it protects the citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. It protects the individual inside their homes and, most recently, in the use of tecnologies. There is a need to have a search warrant granted by a judge to investigate insides people houses and phones.
The GreenDuds company is acting against the law when it allows the investigators to use "whatever means necessary", since it assumes that they will probably break phone records not by doing a claim to a judge, but by unlawful means, such as hacking or paying someone in the phones company to provide those informations.
