Answer:
Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.
Explanation:
In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the<u> levels-of-processing effect</u> that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.
There are two main levels of processing: <u>shallow processing</u>, which has to do with fragile memory, and <u>deep processing</u><u>,</u> that involves a more durable memory trace.
<u>Deep processing</u> can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, <u>deep processing</u> can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.
Answer: this is an example of <u>operant variability.</u>
Explanation:
Operant variability means that results of an operation may vary so responses are sometimes easy to predict, at other times responding seems highly variable, unpredictable, or even random. The inability to predict is generally attributed to ignorance of controlling variables.
I believe the answer is: conducting research to learn about the social world
The research in sociology is usually done in order to uncover whether a certain situation created by society affect the lives of the smaller social group. Rather than relying only on the words from authority, it reveal the perspective of all people involved starting from the bottom of society all the way to the power holders.
The answer is - us forces being captured by Japanese forces
One is Phillip Morin Freneau.
Glad I could help, and good luck!
