Financial status impacts marital stability in many different ways. If a married couple struggles with financial worries there would be be blaming, worrying and shame in the family that can lead to many arguments. The husband or the wife may feel they are not doing enough to provide and to protect their families and may feel anxious as a result. If the main concern of a family is its financial survival, many other necessities may get neglected because of lack of money. The couple may feel tense and the tension may even contribute to the break up of the marriage.
Other factors associated with a couple's financial status are: health, education, recreational activities. The better the couple's financial status, the more healthier the family is, the better the education they can afford for their children and the better the cultural and social activities they can participate in.
Answer:
The things that do not belong to a person community or group but belong to a Nation is known as National Heritage.
Answer: Revenue is the amount of money that the government collects from taxes or borrowing.
Explanation:
Just like an individual or an organization, the government needs resources (some sort of income) to cover its expenses, to maintain all its systems alive (education, public health) and deliver quality public services.
The government gets money from taxes, borrowing and other various non-tax sources.
The amount government spends on defense is called military expenditure, the amount the government is owes is called public debt and the amount the government uses to provide social services is called social expenditure.
Answer:
respiratory system: helps you to keep breathing
circulatory system: helps keep the blood flowing
skeletal system: your bones that keep your body looking like jello
muscular system: helps you stay in shape, and is much heavier than fat
digestive system: your body digesting food to get nutrients
Explanation:
respiratory system: your lungs
circulatory system: an organ system that gets blood to help get nutrients, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and other things
Skeletal system: basically your bones. they help you get up and stay up off the ground. you can't get up the mountain without your bones.
Muscular system: your muscular system is everywhere in your body. you use muscles to pick up your food and even use them to get off the couch.
digestive system: you will be digesting food or water on your climb, and you will need the digestive system to do this so you get the power to go higher
The answer is, in the particular case of the Koran, is more complex than a very Manichean yes or no. The reason is that according to core Islamic theology, the Koran is the direct, verbal revelation of Allah (Islamic God) to Muhammad and it establishes a set of religious principles that are considered to be literal, universal, perfect and thus unchangeable since it would be a mortal sin to change the perfect “word of God”. In most Islamic countries, Islam is considered by their constitution to be the sole and/or major source of legislation for all spheres of society and since Islam is the perfect, immutable, infallible and final revelation of God to humanity it is <em>haram </em>to question it. Now, there is Sharia law which has four different sources:
- The Koran.
- The <em>Sunnah </em>(those <em>hadiths </em>who are considered authentic).
- The <em>Qiyas </em>(analytical reasoning of the former two).
- The <em>Jima </em>(the juridical consensus of the previous analysis).
In a nutshell, there is the direct word of God, then there are the actions, words and deeds of its prophet Muhammad (the hadith) and then there is the traditional examination of such precepts by Islamic Scholars and the consensus achieved after such examination. Officially, according to Fundamentalist Islamic traditionalists, no interpretation can be made of that but since there are several schools of thought in Islam, there are <em>de facto</em> different interpretations and also there is the fact that in the modern world Islamic countries have combined Islamic jurisprudence with Western jurisprudence which is not considered to be divine therefor the answer would be a yes, but a yes that contemplates such caveats. Furthermore, the extreme schism between fundamentalist Islamic traditionalists and more moderate law makers leaves the question unanswered until one of these groups prevail.
