Answer:
C. He can hire a new employee for a temporary replacement
Explanation:
because what if the other states are going to shut down the trade industry and you just shut down your shoe factory the whole city is going to be shoe less so i would say c and wait to find a worthy successor for his position in the shoe manufacturing business.
Answer: $28940
Explanation:
Their QBI deduction for the year goes thus:
Jason's QBI amount will be:
= $173000 × 20%
= $173000 × 0.2
= $34600
Paula's QBI amount will be:
= $28,300× 20%
= ($5660)
Therefore, their combined qualified business income will be:
= $34600 - $5660
= $28940
The overall limitation which is based on th modified taxable income will be:
= $247000 × 20%
= $49400
Since $28940 is lesser than $49400, their QBI deduction for the year is $28940
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option - An increase in the state of technology.
The aggregate supply curve in the long run is a vertical line and parallel to the y-axis. |t is perfectly inelastic in the long run.
Now, if there is increase in the money supply in the economy then this will increase the aggregate demand in the short run. Hence, aggregate demand curve shift rightwards, as a result real GDP increases in the short run and move beyond the potential level of real GDP.
Also, there is a creation of inflationary gap in the economy, as a result real GDP shifts back to its initial position at potential real GDP. So, there is no increase real GDP in the long run.
Similarly, decrease in interest rates and an increase in government spending will also results in inflationary gap in the economy. Therefore, doesn't affect the real GDP in the long run.
But an increase in the state of technology is capable of increasing real GDP in the long run. Improvement in the state of technology will shift the long run aggregate supply curve rightwards, as result there is an increase in potential GDP in the long run.
Answer:
a. $236.32 per unit
Explanation:
The Full question is "Adirondak Marketing Inc. manufactures two products, A and B. Presently, the company uses a single plantwide factory overhead rate for allocating overhead to products. However, management is considering moving to a multiple department rate system for allocating overhead. Overhead Total Direct Labor Hours DLH per Product A B Painting Dept. $250,000 10,000 16 4 Finishing Dept. 75,000 12,000 4 16 Totals $325,000 22,000 20 20"
A single plant wide factory overhead rate is been used. Thus, Overhead rate per hour = $325000 / 22000 hrs = $14.77
The total hours required to produce a product = 20 hours in painting + 20 hours in finishing
The total hours required to produce a product = 40 hours
Overhead per product = Overhead rate per hour * The total hours required to produce a product
Overhead per product = $590.8
The DLH required for a product A in painting department = 16 DLH
. Overhead rate per unit for product A in painting department = ($590.8/40 DLH) *16 DLH = $236.32 Per Unit
Answer:
$10.88
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What would be the maximum an investor should pay for the common stock of a firm that has no growth opportunities
Using this formula
Maximum payment for common stock=Dividend/Required rate of return
Let plug in the formula
Maximum payment for common stock=$1.36/.125 Maximum payment for common stock= $10.88
Therefore What would be the maximum an investor should pay for the common stock of a firm that has no growth opportunities is $10.88
