Answer: Comparing the rates of predation on whitefly nymphs coated with a nontoxic dye versus the undyed whitefly nymphs.
Explanation:
A hypothesis refers to an assumption, which is proposed for the sake of an argument which is tested to ascertain if it's true.
The hypothesis can be tested by comparing the rates of predation on whitefly nymphs coated with a nontoxic dye versus the undyed whitefly nymphs.
The answer is 0.11. I just did the quiz on Apex.
Before assessing the two given cases, an assumption needs to be made about the digestion of the two types of food items, corn and beef. Let us assume that both get digested by expending same amount of energy by the human body. Let the amount of energy at producer level be an arbitrary X.
Case 1: Corn to human:
Since corn is at the producer level, it will have X amount of energy. The transfer of energy from corn to human will take place with a loss of 90% energy at the producer level. Hence the humans will receive 10% of X amount of energy.
Case 2: Corn to cow to human:
Since corn has X amount of energy, only 10% will pass to the next level, i.e. cow. So cow has 10% of X. Cow transfers only 10% of the energy that it has. Hence humans receive only 10% of 10% of X amount of energy.
It can be seen that humans receive more energy in case 1 than case 2. Hence we can say that it is more efficient for humans to feed on corn.
I world say national park. because farming could be taking away from the biodiversity. where as the national park planning would be trying to help the biodiversity.
Well, first off we would have more unlimited power supply and we would be able to get it easier because, the sun can produce harmful RB rays, all we would need to do is process it through a machine that can make it into a nuclear radiation rod that could be put into every electrical thing on this planet. We can also kill every one with the fire of a missile, and we could wipe the electrical currents of a nation out in one go.
