According to the structural-functional approach, the one that considered as a direct benefit of disengagement from work is: It allows the next generation to transition into jobs.
Especially when a worker became too old for his job, it would be really beneficial if they start to train a younger potential replacement for him when his retirement time come.
Answer:
the correct answer is A), obviously xd
<em>An</em><em> </em><em>isotope</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>element</em><em> </em><em>having</em><em> </em><em>same</em><em> </em><em>atomic</em><em> </em><em>no</em><em> </em><em>but</em><em> </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>mass</em><em> </em><em>no</em>
<em>Ex</em><em>:</em><em>chlorine</em>
The answer to this question is <span>Increasing; weakens the effects of both reinforcement and punishment..
The more delay being imposed between a response and a consequence, the more our brain not be able to find the correlation between that response and consequence. If the response and consequence happen instantly (for example we feel burnt when touching fire) that our body will most likely to remember the consequence of that certain response.</span>
Answer: A case that had to do with contract interference. Pennzoil made an unsolicited bid to buy 20 percent of Getty Oil at $112.50 per share and the Getty Board approved the agreement. Before the lawyers for both side could approve the agreement, Texaco appeared and offered Getty stockholders $128 a share for the entire company. Getty officers turned their attention to Texaco, but Pennzoil sued, claiming tortious interference. Texaco said they had not interfered because there was no binding contract.
Jury agreed with Penzoil's argument--$7.53 million in actual damages and $3 billion more in punitive damages. After appeals and frantic negotiations, the two parties reached a settlement.
Texaco agreed to pay Penzoil $3 billion as a settlement for having wrongfully interfered with Pennzoil's agreement to buy Getty.
