Answer:
Multiple IRRs:
Said another way, Multiple IRRs occur when a project has more than one <em>internal rate of return.</em> The problem arises where a project has non-normal cash flow (non-conventional cash flow pattern).
Internal rate of return (IRR) is one of the most commonly used capital budgeting tools. Investors make decisions by comparing the IRR of the project under consideration with the <em>hurdle rate</em>. If the IRR is greater than the hurdle rate, the project is accepted, otherwise it is rejected. When there are more than two IRRs, it is not exactly clear which IRR to compare with the hurdle rate.
Hurdle rate is the minimum required rate of return which businesses use as a benchmark to decide whether to invest in a project or not.
<em>So a typical situation which can generate negative cashflows which can in turn lead to multiple IRRs towards the end of the project is where the conditions of investment become adverse towards the end of the project.</em>
Imagine that toward the end of the lifecycle of a project, a forecasted increase external costs such as Interest Rate, influenced by government policies translates to an erosion of the bottom line generated by the business in that year.
Period 0 1 3 3 4 5
Unconventional cash flows ($)-19,000 16,000 16,000 6,000 6,000 -52,000
The series is non-conventional cash-flow pattern, which has two sign changes. This is the range in which the net present value of the non-conventional cash flow series is positive. The multiple IRR problem poses a series problem to analysts because the decision is not obvious.
Cheers!
The bank puts interest in your account because they take sum of it to loan to ppl and it’s goes through a lot and comes back to your account and then sum
A worker’s positive reaction to a negative performance review from an employer might be option A "ignore the criticisms made at the review." Option A seems to be the best fit for this question because option B would I consider a negative reaction because addressing the employer over the negative review could start a fight and the other two seem too irrelevant for this question.
Hope this helps.
Willow Corp NOL carryover to 2021 (year 4) is $10,000
<h3>How to calculate Willow Corp NOL carryover to year 4</h3>
Carry forward losses:
- Year 1 = $50,000
- Year 2 = $40,000
Total carry forward losses = $50,000 + $40,000
= $90,000
Eligible carry forward loss = $100,000 × 80%
= $100,000 × 0.8
= $80,000
Willow Corp tax liability in year 3 = $100,000 - $80,000 × 21%
= $20,000 × 21%
= 20,000 × 0.21
= $4,200
Willow Corp NOL carryover to year 4 = Total carry forward losses - Eligible carry forward loss
= $90,000 - $80,000
= $10,000
Learn more about tax:
brainly.com/question/25504231
Answer:
B) Country A uses fewer resources to produce corn than Country B does.
Explanation:
An absolute advantage is a situation where a country or a company can produce some goods and services using fewer inputs compared to competitors. The company can produce more quantity of using the same amount of inputs than others. A country with an absolute advantage will manufacture a product at a lower cost than other countries or companies.
Absolute advantage enables companies and countries to gain from trade. Through specialization, a company will focus on what it can produce at a lower cost than others, and sell it. Country A has an absolute advantage if it can produce corn at a lower cost than country B.
