In a common-sized income statement, each item is expressed as a percentage of net income. TRUE
Commonplace-size earnings statement is the vertical evaluation of the income statement. A vertical analysis indicates all gadgets as chances and now not in absolute figures which affords a higher assessment. each line object is expressed as a percent determined by the base parent within the declaration.
A not unusual length earnings statement is an earnings declaration wherein each line item is expressed as a percent of the price of revenue or income. it's far used for vertical analysis, in which each line object in a monetary assertion is represented as a percentage of a base figure inside the assertion.
Commonplace length statements are usually expressed in the form of percentages. therefore, such statements are also known as a hundred according to cent statements or factor percent statements as all of the individual items are taken as a percent of 100.
Learn more about common-sized here:
brainly.com/question/13478191
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
The adjusting journal entry is shown below:
Interest receivable A/c Dr $200
To Interest revenue A/c $200
(Being the interest earned is recorded)
Since the interest would not be received but it is earned so we debited the interest receivable account and credited the interest revenue account.
The other accounts which are given in the brackets are wrong.
Answer:
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in this question, we can use the following method to be solve the question below using Microsoft word we have the solution in the image attached file below
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
When you buy a car, you own the car when you finish paying. Leasing is when you rent it.
