t\the ansir is fondin fader
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2><h2><u>Historians have identified several causes that led to the outbreak of the Cold War, including: tensions between the two nations at the end of World War II, the ideological conflict between both the United States and the Soviet Union, the emergence of nuclear weapons, and the fear of communism in the United States.</u></h2><h2><u>Explanation:</u></h2><h2><u>I hope i helped =)</u></h2>
Answer:
To help the nation as they want
The options available
A. masculine courage
B. socialization
C. virtue
D. pride in manhood
Answer:
Masculine courage
Explanation:
The Option B is not correct, because Socialization deals basically with interactions of individuals, by mixing with others, and learning to live according to the standard of the society.
The Option C is not, because Virtue has to do with behavior of an individual, that is morally accepted
The Option D is not correct either, because the act of Rudy is not that of pride.
However, Rudy, which is a guy, is trying to show that he is a "man" and he is courageous amd can keep going, regardless of whatever happens or despite having just been treated from concussion.
Hence, the right answer is MASCULINE COURAGE.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
