Answer:
Negatively repressible.
Explanation:
A control which occurs through repressor is known as negative control which may be inducible or repressible.
When a small molecule named as allolactose binds this repressor it leads to allosteric repulsion which removes repressor from the operator as a result of which RNA polymerase can start transcription. Allolactose is therefore known as inducer because it induces lac operon expression.
But here, the operator is active (induced) already so there is no need to induce the operon which means that it can only be repressed so that transcription could stop. So the answer is negatively repressible operon.
Transpiration is the main driver
1) False. Scientists may predict something but realize a difference soon after before the test, so they could definitely change the hypothesis if they want. It’s only AFTER the experiment they cannot. Because a hypothesis is like a “guess” as to what’s going to happen, right?
2) False. A hypothesis can’t be “valid” because it’s literally a prediction.
3) True. Especially if you’re doing a chemistry lab, it’s really important things are done in order or else the product might result as something else you were expecting, or can be very dANGEROUS
4) True. The conclusion must be based on data because it’s the observation that was seen.
Hope this helps!! I could have answered in short form but I just wanted to make them understandable:)
I believe the answer is c
