Answer:
Stockholders
Explanation:
Stockholders are the owners of a company. As owners , stockholders have voting rights in the company. Shareholder elects directors who represent them on the board of directors. Each share is equivalent to one vote. The board members recruit top management of the company. The board provides policy guidelines, makes critical decisions, and supervises senior management.
By electing board members, shareholders influence the management of the business. Should the stockholders be unhappy with the way the company is being managed, they can vote out the current director and elect new ones. The new directors then appoint fresh managers. In this way, shareholders maintain control of the assets of the company and its assets.
Answer:
The company’s systemic risk level (beta coefficient) is 2.44%
Explanation:
According to Capm Expected Return of Stock = Risk Free Rate + Beta*(Market Return - Risk Free Rate)
Beta = (Expected Return of Stock - Risk freed Rate)/(Market return -Risk free Rate)
= (12.5% - 1.5%)/(6% - 1.5%)
=2.44
%
Therefore, The company’s systemic risk level (beta coefficient) is 2.44%
Systematic risk is the risk which affects all the stocks of the economy. It cannot be diversified away. Example interest rate and inflation in the economy. Beta represents systematic risk of the company.
Answer:
all of the above characterize dealer markets.
- no time-consuming search for a fair deal.
- a guarantee of order fulfillment because the dealer holds an inventory of securities.
- improved market efficiency because dealers provide continuous bid and ask prices for securities.
Explanation:
A dealer market is a market where financial dealers post their trading prices (the buying and selling price of stocks, bonds, foreign currency, etc.). The largest dealer market in the US is Nasdaq where stocks are traded electronically. The main difference between a dealer market and a regular auction market like the NYSE is that no bidding takes place since operations are done in a split second.
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
Answer:
Explanation:
1) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are not allowed to trade permits is:
total loss = farmer A' loss + farmer B's loss
where:
- farmer A's loss = (100 - 50) x $25 = $1,250
- farmer B's loss = (100 - 50) x $50 = $2,500
total loss = $1,250 + $2,500 = $3,750
2) The total cost of reducing runoff if the farmers are allowed to trade permits is:
Since farmer A will be willing to sell his permits to farmer B for a price that is ≥ $25 and ≤ $50, the total cost of reducing runoff is $2,500.
If farmer A sells his runoff permit at a price higher than $25 his costs will decrease but farmer B's costs will increase, so any gain due to price change is offset by the other farmer's loss.
