Answer:
espero que esto ayude :) I hope this helps :)
What is the difference between society and community? is that the society is built upon interactions with varied people whereas the community is the collection of people with similar interests, essentially residing in one geographic place. The individual is the basic component of both community and society.
¿Cuál es la diferencia entre sociedad y comunidad?
es que la sociedad se basa en interacciones con personas variadas, mientras que la comunidad es la colección de personas con intereses similares, que residen esencialmente en un lugar geográfico. El individuo es el componente básico de la comunidad y la sociedad.
Explanation:
Answer:
hearsay
Explanation:
According to my research on federal law investigations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question most federal courts assume that the records contain hearsay. This term means that the evidence contains unofficial information acquired from another and not part someone's direct knowledge. This is usually inadmissible in court unless proven that it was obtained legally.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Historia de la biodiversidad resumida
<span>summary history of biodiversity.
I hope I could help! :) </span>
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
