<span>Discrimination that is not consciously or deliberately sought, but it brought about by stereotypes or as an unintended outcome.</span>
Answer:
As a result of an increase in the YTM, the price of the bond will fall $4677.19 from to $4593.67
Explanation:
The bonds are valued or priced based on the present value of annuity of interest payments and the present value of the principal. Based on the YTM of 7.8% the bonds are priced at,
coupon payment = 5000 * 0.067 *1/2 = $167.5
Semiannual YTM = 7.8 *0.5 = 3.9%
Semi annual periods to maturity = 8 * 2 = 16 periods
Old Price = 167.5 * [( 1 - (1 + 0.039)^-16 + 5000 / (1+0.039)^16
Old Price = $4677.19
New semiannual YTM = 8.1% / 2 = 4.05%
New Price = 167.5 * [( 1 - (1+0.0405)^-16) / 0.0405] + 5000 / 1.0405^16
New Price = $4593.67
Answer: A. Cournot Oligopoly B. Stackelberg Oligopoly C. Bertrand Oligopoly
Explanation:
Cournot Model: In Cournot model, firms produce output independently and then set their prices. In this type of model, the products are typically standardized.
Stackelberg Model: In Stackelberg model, there is one firm who is quite dominant and that firm sets the price. Whereas, other firms or the competing lower firms usually follow the price leader.
Bertrand Model: In this model, firms have interaction with buyers in order to set prices and quantities.
Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
