Answer:
about 170
Step-by-step explanation:
i say thi because 360 into 4 quadrants is 90 per qudrant than tge second quadrant is almost full so i put the answer nearly 2 quadrants
Answer:
4/20 - 5/20 = -1/20, and therefore, since the answer is negative, you've proven that 5/20 (or the original 1/4) is actually the bigger number, not the 4/20 (or 1/5).
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!
Here are the steps involved in answering this question:
1. Write 8 out of 200 as a fraction which is
2. Turn the fraction into a decimal. To do this, divide the numerator by the denominator. The numerator is the top part of the fraction while the denominator is the bottom part of the fraction.

= 0.04
3. You get 0.04. Now, turn this into a percent. Move the decimal, 2 places to the right or just multiply the decimal by 100.
0.04 = 4%
The final answer is 4%.Another way of doing this is to get 100 as a denominator.
Since, percent means, "Out of 100", we have to make the denominator 100.
1. 
= 4/100
Just divide each side by 2.
Again, the final answer is, 4%
<span>(If you feel that my answer has helped you, please consider rating it and giving it a thank you! Also, feel free to make the best answer, the brainliest answer!)
</span>
<span>Thank you! :D</span>
Answer:
u can ask if u didn't understand !
Answer:
B. The evidence is very strong - there is NO difference in the proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.
Step-by-step explanation: Generally, a p-value of less than 0.05 is described as a strong evidence in favour of the null hypothesis. A p-value also known as the probability value is also known to provide the smallest level of evidence at which the null hypothesis would be rejected.
In the question, The p-value is 0.105 which is bigger in value than 0.05 which means there is no significant difference between the evidence and the null hypothesis.