1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
2 years ago
5

I will give Brainly liest answer if you answer this. I need it for delta math please please please

Mathematics
1 answer:
Ludmilka [50]2 years ago
4 0
24-87!=ysuusjdjxjdjdjjxo
You might be interested in
The fuel for a chain saw is a mix of oil and gasoline. The ratio of ounces of oil to gallons of gasoline is 9:19. There are 152
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
9/19 = x / 152....9 oz oil to 19 gallons gas = x oz oil to 152 gallons gas
cross multiply because this is a proportion
(19)(x) = (152)(9)
19x = 1368
x = 1368/19
x = 72 oz of oil <==
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help please x+y=6 and x-y=4 solve for X
fredd [130]
X=5  y=1 this what i got when i worked it out on my paper. hope that helps.
6 0
3 years ago
A halogen-lighting manufacturer packs 64 halogen lamps ink a cube-shaped container. the manufacturer has been asked by his distr
sashaice [31]
If the original container can hold 64 halogen lamps and the new container can hold 8 lamps, then
64/8 = 8
There will 8 smaller containers needed to pack all of the 64 lamps from the original large cubed-shaped container.
7 0
3 years ago
Linear Algebra question! Please help!
kozerog [31]

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

5 0
2 years ago
7. Which of the following equations are
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
C and E are the right ones
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alexa took out a $42,000 loan to remodel a house. The loan rate is 8.3% simple interest per year and will be repaid in six month
    13·1 answer
  • Farmer Jones has 140 feet of fencing to construct a rectangular corral.
    12·1 answer
  • *Help needed*
    14·2 answers
  • Write using algebra.
    15·1 answer
  • A+c =r-d solve for a.
    7·1 answer
  • Someone help me with this ASAP please help lots of points
    7·1 answer
  • Write an equation of the line that passes through the points (-2,-7) and (0,-4). ​
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP MEEEE PLEASE I BEG
    14·2 answers
  • Solve for x -2x -3&lt;5
    12·2 answers
  • Which number gives the exact value of 4 5/6
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!