Answer:
D. When ITQs are used, no one has an incentive to cheat and exceed the quota.
Explanation:
As ITQs (individual transferable quotas) were initially created by the government to regulate an above all, social affair, which is related to the share in the total allowable catch of fish (species).
Since some of the fishermen have lower and some have higher marginal costs of "producing" fish, they trade ITQ's between themselves, with those who have high marginal costs selling ITQs to those that have low marginal costs. Also, the marginal private cost now becomes determined by the initial marginal private cost of the fish, plus the <u>price of the ITQ</u>. Then, it becomes known as the marginal social cost.
The equilibrium for the ITQ price is the difference between the <em>marginal social benefit</em> and the marginal cost. With the base marginal private cost becoming the marginal social cost, no one has the incentive to exceed the quota, as that would make the marginal cost go higher than the price, and the marginal profit lower. This notion creates the equality between self-interest and social interest.
Answer:
- yes
- Because the state lottery provides for administrative hearings
Explanation:
The plaintiffs must exhaust their administrative remedies before a court of law would grant them the opportunity to pursue a legal action against the lottery board because it might a breach in communication or administration from the lottery board or the lottery director and the plaintiffs should seek to resolve the issues without having to seek a legal action but through administrative remedies and procedures which more swift in resolving such issues
Answer:
This lease is regarded and classified as Capital lease.
Explanation:
This lease is regarded and classified as Capital lease.
Here, Callaway Golf Co. is the body financing the leased asset but the right ownership is with Photon Company.
Now; the present value of future payment is calculated as:
Present value of future payment =[PVA 6%,5 × Annual payment ]+[PVF 6%,5 × Residual value]
=[4.46511 × 31000] +[0.74726 × 15500]
= 138418.27+ 11582.53
= 150000
However the present value of minimum lease payment is equal or more than 90% fair market value ,as such we therefore conclude that this lease is a capital lease.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
