Answer:
Solution:
Dollar amount of total return = Capital gain distributions + Change in market value
First, we calculate the capital gain distributions
Income and capital gains distribution = ($0.12 + $0.22) x 130 shares
Income and capital gains distribution = $44.2
Now, we calculate the change in market value
Change in market value = Sales Price - Purchase price
Change in market value = 130 x $24 - 130 x $27
Change in market value = -$390
Therefore,
Dollar amount of total return = $44.2 + (-$390)
Dollar amount of total return = -$345.80
Answer:
different
Explanation:
There is a significant difference in small firms leadership compared to large firms depending on legal structures, number of employees in a firm and financial availability.
Large firms have more departments, employees, and operations compared to small ones. For instance, the leadership style and structure required to manage operations and employees in large firms will need to be highly structured to ensure there is effective command and information flow. For small firms, a simple command and communication flow structure will suffice as the number of employees and departments involved are few.
Answer:
After observing the question, there are blank spaces to fill in the question. These blank spaces are to be filled with the right answers. Since it was not shown in the question, I will write out the question again and appropriately add the answers for proper understanding. I hope it helps.
In order to qualify as substantial performance, the party who fails to perform perfectly must perform <u>in good faith</u>. <u>Intentional</u> failure to comply with the contract terms is a <u>breach</u> of the contract. The performance must not vary greatly from the promised performance: an omission, variance or defect in performance is considered <u>minor</u> if it can be <u>remedied</u> by compensation. finally, the performance must create substantially the same <u>benefits</u> as those promised in the contract.
Answer:
The person is NOT spending her income for both goods in a manner that maximizes her satisfaction.
Explanation:
Based on the information given The person is NOT spending her income for both goods in a manner that maximizes her satisfaction which means that she would have to INCREASE baseball games consumption and DECREASE movies consumption reason been that we were told that an individual enjoys going to baseball game three times compare to seeing new movie which therefore means The price of the ticket for a baseball game which is the amount of $30 should be increase while the price of a ticket for a movie which is the amount of $15 should be decrease.
The philosophy discussed above is called enabling.
Enabling is providing workers with the education and tools they need to make decisions. Companies can empower workers by enabling them with the knowledge to make decisions that will benefit the company and satisfy the customers in the long run. This will lead to increase in profitability.
