It is not fair in my opinion, because the 50 year old has already lived a life, where as the 20 year old hasn't. The 50 year old has already has done things in his or her life that the 20 year old won't be able to do. For example, when the 20 year old gets out of jail he will be 80 meaning he may never experience things such as getting married, having children, and etc. The 50 year old may have already done those things in his or her life, so it is very unfair to the 20 year old. The sentencing is also unfair due to the fact being both of them committed the crime and should have the same time served in jail.
Hint: that the last sentence might not hold up due to the fact of what he or she did and it pertains to how serve the crime was for both parties. Such as one person killed someone, while the other one didn't pull the trigger but was an accomplice or new about the killing. So it really depends on the crime or crimes the person has committed.
I’m pretty sure it is C :))
I would have to say that it is Ghana
<u>Answer:</u>
The veto power of the government can be over ridden by the party of congress of the United States where every chamber of this party can go against the bill that has been proposed by the president and to go against this bill of the president the share of votes required in each chamber is two third of the total number of members in the whole chamber. But this is not a very common process and happens rarely.
