The correct answer is A. Brief in-text citations connected to a works cited page
Explanation:
MLA stands for Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publishing and consist on a manual with guidelines for edition and publishing of documents with an academic style, according to this manual when using other sources whether this occurs as direct citations or paraphrasing, information about the author should be provided, in the case of in-text citations the last name of the author, date of publication, and in some cases page is included before or after being cited in a brief citation, however, all the information related to the source should be included at the end of the document in a reference list, which is a list of all the works cited or used during the text, in this list wider information of the source is provided such as the title of the source, where was it publish, among other. Thus, according to MLA citation information about source should be included through brief in text-citation (last name of author and date) and a list of all the sources with the complete information of the source.
I believe it is the last blue sentence
When Phil Davison said "use it not only as a tool, but as a weapon," he violated which guideline of proactive speech delivery as he did everything opposite to the guidelines of a proactive speech rules.
Because these are the rules apply to proactive speech, the speech should be meaningful and your voice should be expressive. Reduce the number of pauses while delivering the speech like ums, uhs, likes, and y'knows. Spell words out loudly. Don't murmur or mispronounce them.
Use the proper volume and pace when speaking. Consider the topic, location, and audience. To make your point clearer and keep the audience's attention, vary your voice's pace, intonation, and power. But what Phil Davison did was Despite possessing a master's in communication, things just get worse from there.
His voice starts to grow, but not in the positive way we talked about in class. Davison starts shouting at the top of his lungs one minute and twenty-five seconds into the speech. If frightening the audience by screaming at them qualifies as pathos, Davison is making the most of pathos. I was unable to discover how Davison used pathos in any other way. And he did everything against the guidelines of proactive speech.
To know more about speech:
brainly.com/question/3743745
#SPJ4
