Answer:
B or C
I forcibly pick C because it makes sense so just pick C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
I'm pretty sure it would be y=2x+9
To find the total amount, you will use the formula for finding compounded interest. This means you will be paid interest on top of the interest you have earned each year.
A = P(1 + r)^nt
P stands for the principal.
r is the interest rate when compounded annually
nt is the number of years
A = 17.50(1 + 0.04)^25
A = $46.65
This person would have $46.65 after 25 years.
