Take him out to dinner. maybe wash his car, buy him a new puppy. compliment his shoes, compliment his dad sandals with white socks. tell him yes, his high school letter jacket DOES fit. buy him McDonalds. look deep into his eyes, and say
" if you were a man, you'd get some braces so you don't look like Bugs Bunny..."
Answer:
1/8
Explanation:
Father: normal vision, type A
Mother: normal vision, type A
They can only produce a colourblind son if female is the carrier for it:
XC Xc
XC XCXC XCXc
Y XCY XcY
XcY son will be colorblind. Hence father has XCY genotype and mother has XCXc genotype for vision.
They can only produce type O son if both of them are heterozygous for type A:
A O
A AA AO
O AO OO
OO son will have type O blood. Hence both father and mother have AO genotype for blood type.
Probability of having a female child=1/2
Probability of having a normal vision female child = 1 since in the first punnett square it has been shown that all female children have normal vision ( half are carriers )
Probability of having type O child = 1/4
Probability of having a female child with normal vision and type O blood = 1/2 * 1 * 1/4 = 1/8
Grants are large sums of money that dont need to paid back so it helps when all the money goes to that said community
A !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The correct answer is - A. All dogs are mammals. Peanut is a dog. Hence, Peanut is a mammal.
The inductive reasoning in essence is a method of reasoning is which the premises are viewed as providing some evidence for what is the truth of the conclusion.
In this case, ''all dogs are mammals'' gives us the basis for the conclusion. There's a dog named Peanut, and since all dogs are mammals, Peanut is mammal too because it is a dog. In the first part of the sentence we have a premise that gives us an evidence, which put together with the description gives us the conclusion, or rather gives us truthful conclusion.
