Answer:
The firm will not sell any bundle, the amount of bundle to be sold will be zero.
Explanation
Solution
Since firm sells at $25 each for coats and pants, then If consumer wants to purchase both Pant and Coat, the customer will have to pay 25 + 25 = $50.
Also, If consumer purchase Pant and Coat as a Bundle then, he will pay 150. From the question stated we can conclude that their is a form of interest to pay for Pant and Coat for Both consumers are higher than 25.
However, they will have to pay an amount less for 1 coat and 1 pant if they buy this in a separate way instead of a Bundle.
We can say, that type of consumers (both) will not buy the pants and coat as a bundle, but will want to buy them separately.
Therefore, any bundle will not be sold by firm. the amount of Bundle sold will be known as a zero Bundle
Your answer might be C , the pay has to be increased cause the hours increased,cant be b because the weekly payrool cant be same,ya feel?
Answer: $85,000
Explanation:
Drawings are debited/deducted from the Equity account to reflect that the owner's holdings in the business has reduced.
Profit is added to the Equity account in the form of Retained Earnings.
The closing Balance on Equity is;
Closing Balance = Opening Balance + Profit - Drawings
Profit = Closing Balance - Opening Balance + Drawings
Profit = 175,000 - 120,000 + 30,000
Profit = $85,000
Answer:
The correct option is;
Loss of national monetary and exchange rate policy
Explanation:
The disadvantages of the establishment of monetary unions includes;
1) The loss of independence in monetary policy
2) The associated problems that arise due to the the initial establishment of the union
3) Tedious nature of the task of attaining comprehensive capital mobility
The advantages are;
1) Lack of uncertainty in exchange rate variation
2) Reduced cost of doing business
3) Improved fiscal stability as well as control of the inflation rate by supranational central bank.
Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.
