Answer: (ii) We reject H0---this sample provides significant evidence that the program is effective.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is
The program is not effective for weight loss.
The alternative hypothesis is
The program is effective for weight loss.
If the P-value for the test turns out to be 0.012, and the level of significance is 0.05, then
Alpha, 0.05 > p value, 0.012
Therefore, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. We then accept the alternative hypothesis.
The correct option is
(ii) We reject H0---this sample provides significant evidence that the program is effective.
Answer:
<em>Value</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>expression</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>-35</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>HAVE A NICE DAY</em><em>!</em>
<em>THANKS FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY</em><em> </em><em>TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION</em><em>. </em>
Answer:
17
Step-by-step explanation:
We have two congruent triangles here. Thus, b must be 17.
For this problem, let x be the number of children and y for adults. Formulate the equations: 1st equation, x + y = 3,200 and 2nd equation 5x + 9y = 24,000. Re-arrange 1st equation into x = 3200 - y. Then, substitute into 2nd equation, 5(3,200-y) + 9y = 24,000. Then, solve for y. The 16,000 - 5y + 9y = 24000. Final answer is, y = 2000 adults went to watch the movie.
