1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna11 [10]
3 years ago
9

Felicia Robinson is running for school board in a large eastern city. Her opponent is conducting what Felicia regards as a highl

y unethical cam- paign. In addition to twisting the facts about school taxes, the opponent is pandering to racial prejudice by raising resentment against African Ameri- cans and recently arrived immigrants. Five days before the election, Felicia, who is slightly behind in the polls, learns that the district attorney is preparing to indict her opponent for shady business practices. But the indictment will not be formally issued until after the election. Nor can it be taken as evidence that her opponent is guilty—like all citizens, he has the right to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise. Still, news of the indictment could be enough to throw the election Felicia’s way, and her advisers urge her to make it an issue in her remain- ing campaign speeches. Should Felicia follow their advice?
Explain what whould be the most ethlial course of action in her case, and why?
Business
1 answer:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

She should follow their advise by mentioning the opponents impending indictment

Explanation:

Based on ethics, except a person has been tried and found to be guilty, he or she is innocent. By bringing up a case of this indictment, there would be a violation of the ethical rights of this opponent by Felicia.

But again, we have to put the school into consideration. If this opponent had really done these unethical things as projected by Felicia, then it would be an unethical treatment on her part to the entire school which would be in the hands of such a person.

So on Felicia's art we have to consider two things, unethical treatment toward school by not mentioning the opponents indictment and also unethical treatment towards the opponent by bringing up the indictment

For me I think, the ethical thing for her to do would be to mention the impending indictment of the opponent.

Thank you!

You might be interested in
The Constitution sets out the authority and the limits of the branches of the government.
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

The correct answer is c. ​each branch has some power to limit the actions of the others.

Explanation:

The separation of powers or division of powers is a political principle in some forms of government, in which the legislative, executive and judicial powers of the State are exercised by distinct, autonomous and independent organs of government. This is the fundamental quality that characterizes representative and presidential democracy.

Montesquieu argued that “every man who has power is inclined to abuse it; He goes until he finds limits. So that the power cannot be abused, it is necessary that, by the disposition of things, the power stops the power ».3 In this way, the vigilance of the three powers among themselves is entrusted as each one watches, controls and stops the excesses of others to prevent, by their own ambition, that some of them predominate over others. It can be contrasted with the fusion of powers and separation of functions in parliamentary systems, where the executive and the legislature are unified, because the legislature appoints the executive.

3 0
3 years ago
The goal to identify whether some tasks are consistently performed poorly and/or whether there are deficient ksaos across the wo
Serjik [45]

The goal in order to identify if the task are performed in a poor or good manner and if there are any deficient KSAO’s in the workforce is known as the task analysis. This is a process about having to use observation as a way of having to understand tasks or details that are being performed and if the goal has been reach.

3 0
3 years ago
Determine whether each scenario is an example of tax avoidance or tax evasion. Andrea keeps a record of all her business-related
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

1. Tax avoidance

2.Tax avoidance

3.Tax evasion

Explanation:

Tax avoidance refers to a legal way of reducing one's tax liability through lawful deductions. Ways to reduce tax liabilities are; capitalizing on tax advantage retirement accounts, liasing with tax advisor on the legal way for tax avoidance. Tax avoidance is however legal.

Examples of tax avoidance are;

1. Andrea keeps a record of all her business related expenses.

2. Daniel claims the amount of interest paid for his mortgage as tax deductions.

Tax evasion is a deliberate attempt by a tax payer to avoid payment of tax liability. It is a fraudulent action by a tax payer to wilfully evade tax in an illegal manner. In tax evasion, income is concealed to tax authorities inorder to evade tax payment which is a criminal offence. It is to be noted that tax evasion is illegal in the eye of the law.

Example of tax evasion is ;

3. Christian did not report the tips he earned on his tax return.

7 0
3 years ago
Acort Industries owns assets that will have a 75% probability of having a market value of $52 million in one year. There is a 25
abruzzese [7]

Solution :

a). The current market value of the unlevered equity

   $=\frac{75\% \times \$52 \text{ million} + 25\% \times \$22 \text{ million}}{1+10 \%}$

   = $ 40.45 million

b). The market value of the equity one year from now is

  $=(75\% \times \$52 \text{ million} + 25\% \times \$22 \text{ million})- \$18 \ \text{million}$

  = $ 44.5 million - $ 18 million

  = $ 26.5 million

c). The expected return on the equity without the leverage = 10%

     The expected return on the equity with the leverage =   $=10\% +\frac{ \$22 \text{ million}}{\$ 26.5 \text{ million}}$

= 0.93 %

d). The lowest possible value of equity without the leverage = $20 million - $ 18 million

= $ 2 million

The lowest return on the equity without the leverage = 10%

The lowest return on the equity with the leverage = 2 % as the equity is eroded.

8 0
3 years ago
All of the following are fees typically charged by credit card companies EXCEPT:
Naya [18.7K]
D. would be the correct answer I believe!
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Market research should be conducted:
    11·1 answer
  • What is one way to begin saving startup capital?
    8·1 answer
  • What is free trade? A. Trade that is not subject to taxes or fees B. Trade that governments do not interfere with C. Trade with
    12·1 answer
  • Suitable options to solve the financial problem of a restaurant owner
    6·1 answer
  • Sam closed the doors to her home-based consulting company only two years after opening because she was tired of working 80-hour
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following accurately describes the process of currency
    10·1 answer
  • If interest rates fall in the USA relative to the rest of the world the demand for US dollar will ________ because there is less
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose a stock had an initial price of $75 per share, paid a dividend of $1.55 per share during the year, and had an ending sha
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following factors, all else being equal, will increase the net present value of cash? 1) increase in reclamation 2)
    7·2 answers
  • A printer used 1890 digits to number all the page. How many pages in the book
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!