Answer:
x₁ > x₂
Step-by-step explanation:
Both actions imply a parable trajectories, since both are projectile shot cases.
Let´s call x₁ maximum distance in the first case
The maximum height is just in the middle of the curve, therefore x₁ the maximum horizontal distance is equal to 60 feet.
In the second case, the parable curve is modeled by:
y = x₂*( 0.08 - 0.002x₂) or y = 0.08*x₂ - 0.002*x₂²
A second degree equation, solving for x₂ and dismissing the value x₂ = 0
we get:
y = 0 ⇒ x₂*( 0.08 - 0.002x₂) = 0 x₂ = 0
And 0,08 - 0.002*x₂ = 0
- 0.002*x₂ = - 0.08
x₂ = 0.08/0.002
x₂ = 40 f
Then x₁ > x₂
Answer:
The error is at step (3) .
The correct step (3) will be,
= 
[by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The error is at the step (3) , because the student has tried to prove the quotient rule of logarithms by using the property i.e., 'The quotient rule of logarithm' itself , i.e. ,by assuming the property does hold before proving it. So, the proof is fallacious.
The correct step (3) will be,
= [by using the laws of indices]
All other steps are correct.
Answer:
Arc DE = 90°
m<GAB = 82°
Arc DC = 49°
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
m<EAF = 74°
m<EAD = right angle = 90°
Arc BG = 82°
Required:
Arc DE,
<GAB, and
Arc DC
Solution:
Recall that the central angle measure = the intercepted arc measure.
Therefore:
✔️Arc DE = m<EAD
Arc DE = 90° (Substitution)
✔️m<GAB = arc BG
m<GAB = 82° (Substitution)
✔️Arc DC = m<CAD
Find m<CAD
m<CAD = ½(180 - m<GAB)
m<CAD = ½(180 - 82)
m<CAD = 49°
Arc DC = m<CAD
Arc DC = 49°
To find the scaled version of this rectangle by 1/2, start by identifying what this scale factor does to effect the numbers.
In this case, it causes each to divide by two.
Divide each value on the length and width of the rectangle by two.
This results in:
4/2
8/2
Now, perform the division to find your final answer.
This gives you 2 ft by 4 ft.
Answer choice C is the best option.
I hope this helps! :)
