Answer:
The best way to find terms of trade that will ensure that two entities are in the best terms of trade will be to look at the opportunity costs of the various products they produce.
A high opportunity cost in one product relative to that of the other entity means the entity with the higher opportunity cost should be trading with the entity with the lower opportunity cost and vice versa.
For example, assume that an entity "A" produces both rice and beans whilst an entity "B" also produces rice and beans too.
If the opportunity cost to A of producing Beans is 300 bags of rice whilst the opportunity cost to B of producing Beans is 120 bags of rice, and the opportunity cost to A of producing rice is 180 bags of beans whilst it is 250 bags of beans to B, the principles of comparative advantage require that A should focus more on producing rice and purchase beans from B whilst B should focus more on producing beans and purchase rice from A.
Cheers!
Answer:
A. True.
Explanation:
One of the direct implementation for this categorization can be seen if you go to your supermarket. Supermarkets tend to categorize their product in a way that resulted in the most sales.
In order to achieve this, they tend to lined up the most popular brands on a place that's close to costumers' eye level on the shelf. The less popular brand will be place on top or lower part of the shelf that's a little bit harder to see.
Answer: A. Zero because all the gains offset the losses.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the net capital gain/loss for the current year will be:
First and foremost, we should note that the net income of $26,000 will not be added to our calculations.
Then, we then add the gain on capital assets from the options a-d given and subtract from the capital loss. This will be:
= $13,000 - ($23,000) + $4,000 + $6,000
= $13000 + $4000 + $6000 - $23000
= $23000 - $23000
= 0
Note that $23000 was subtracted because it was the only loss incurred on the capital asset from the options.
Answer:
Mediation.
Explanation:
This is explained to be a process that has been well structured which is seen to be plain and also interactive, having compulsorily a third party who is impartial in conflict resolution that is seen to be between an employee and a said organisation. Certain mediation cases may be seen to be informal meeting among the parties or a scheduled settlement conference. This dispute in some cases when it is a little blown out of proportion by the mediator, may either be pending in a court or potentially a dispute which may be filed in court. Cases suitable for mediation are disputes in commercial transactions, workers compensation, labor or community relations, domestic relations, employment or any other matters which do not involve complex procedural or evidentiary issues.
