Answer:
Bought stocks on credit, thinking the value could only increase.
Explanation:
Currently the securities and exchange commission (SEC) defines buying stocks on credit as buying through a margin account. This was a very common before the 1929 stock crash since investors speculated that the price of stocks would keep increasing. The notion that the stock prices could fall was not something considered possible back then. So when the market stooped growing, and the price of stocks started to lower, investors couldn't pay their loans and even if the securities were held as collateral, their value collapsed. Some people made huge fortunes doing this, but others lost everything.
Answer:
C). Firing majority workers who perform the least well.
Explanation:
An Affirmative action plan is characterized as the management tool that details of present and future course of action/procedure in order to ensure the rights of every individual on the basis of their caliber, ability, and merit irrespective of their race, gender, class, religion, disability, etc. It primarily aims to offer a fair entry to employment opportunities for all and develop a work community that reflects the demographics of a proficient and qualified workforce. Thus, 'firing majority workers who perform least well' would not be a part of this process as it offers fair access to opportunities on the basis of ability. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
integrated marketing system
Explanation:
Integrated Marketing system harmonizes various channels that represent the promotion dimension of the 4 Ps to convey a value proposition to customers. It is an effective strategy that gives competitive advantage, as well as increase sales and profits efficiently. This system is effective in attracting and retaining customers as it enables a two way dialogue with customers.
Answer:
people face trade offs
Explanation:
Because wants are unlimited and the resources used to satisfy those wants are limited, people have to face trade offs. these trades off are opportunity costs.
Opportunity cost or implicit is the cost of the option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
In this question, the wants are a cell phone or an amplifier. the resource is $200. If the amplifier is bought, the cell phone cannot be purchased. This is an example of a trade off
I think its 32 because if you add and divide
