Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You know how subtraction is the <em>opposite of addition </em>and division is the <em>opposite of multiplication</em>? A logarithm is the <em>opposite of an exponent</em>. You know how you can rewrite the equation 3 + 2 = 5 as 5 - 3 = 2, or the equation 3 × 2 = 6 as 6 ÷ 3 = 2? This is really useful when one of those numbers on the left is unknown. 3 + _ = 8 can be rewritten as 8 - 3 = _, 4 × _ = 12 can be rewritten as 12 ÷ 4 = _. We get all our knowns on one side and our unknown by itself on the other, and the rest is computation.
We know that 
; as a logarithm, the <em>exponent</em> gets moved to its own side of the equation, and we write the equation like this: 
, which you read as "the logarithm base 3 of 9 is 2." You could also read it as "the power you need to raise 3 to to get 9 is 2."
One historical quirk: because we use the decimal system, it's assumed that an expression like 
uses <em>base 10</em>, and you'd interpret it as "What power do I raise 10 to to get 1000?"
The expression 
means "the power you need to raise 10 to to get 100 is x," or, rearranging: "10 to the x is equal to 100," which in symbols is .
(If we wanted to, we could also solve this: 
, so 
)
Answer:
The percentage of people that could be expected to score the same as Matthew or higher on this scale is:
= 93.3%.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Mean score on the scale, μ = 50
Distribution's standard deviation, σ = 10
Matthew scores, x = 65
Calculating the Z-score:
Z-score = (x – μ) / σ
= (65-50)/10
= 1.5
The probability based on a Z-score of 1.5 is 0.93319
Therefore, the percentage of people that could be expected to score the same as Matthew or higher on this scale is 93.3%.
Attached the solution and work.
The absolute value of 3+2>4 the answer is add 3 and 2 then answer to that is 5 then you add 5 to 4 then your is 9
Answer:
1,2,3,6
Step-by-step explanation:
6x1, 2x3, 3x2, 6x1
i study hard and work my hardest
