What is the area of this figure?
1 answer:
Hi!
I have attached 2 images that should help you understand :)
First, look at the edits I made to the image you posted. I separated the shape into smaller shapes so that we can find the area of each individual one.
Let's start with the rectangle.
To find the area of a rectangle, multiply the width times the height.
10 · 4 = 40
Rectangle = 40cm
Next up, the red triangles.
I have included another image showing the triangles combined into rectangles. So we can find the area of the triangles just like we would rectangles!
(let me know if you don't understand how I found the width + height of the triangles)
5 · 10 = 50
Red triangles = 50cm
And finally, the green triangles.
8 · 7 = 56
Green triangles = 56cm
Add it all together and you get...
40 + 50 + 56 = 146
The answer to the question is 146cm.
Next time you are having trouble with something like this, picture the triangles as rectangles! :)
I have attached 2 images that should help you understand :)
First, look at the edits I made to the image you posted. I separated the shape into smaller shapes so that we can find the area of each individual one.
Let's start with the rectangle.
To find the area of a rectangle, multiply the width times the height.
10 · 4 = 40
Rectangle = 40cm
Next up, the red triangles.
I have included another image showing the triangles combined into rectangles. So we can find the area of the triangles just like we would rectangles!
(let me know if you don't understand how I found the width + height of the triangles)
5 · 10 = 50
Red triangles = 50cm
And finally, the green triangles.
8 · 7 = 56
Green triangles = 56cm
Add it all together and you get...
40 + 50 + 56 = 146
The answer to the question is 146cm.
Next time you are having trouble with something like this, picture the triangles as rectangles! :)
You might be interested in
Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the sample mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean is equal to 31.3 MPG, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation, the statistic is given by
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly different from 31.3 MPG