Intergroup conflict always results in positive benefits to individuals the group or the organization.
Explanation:
The social change, decision making, reconciliation, group unity and co operation are some of the positive effects of conflicts in an organization.
The advantages of conflicts are they create awareness for the existing problems. Then by discussing the conflicting views can provide better solutions and managing conflict is quicker and more efficient.
Intergroup conflict in an organization helps the people to come out with their own ideas with creative thinking.
An example for this conflicts are the problems between management and employee and between accounting and operations team, and between UI developers and backend team.
To resolve the problems in intergroup conflict people should openly discuss about the impact that the conflict has on productivity.
Answer:
Classical
Explanation
Classical view point in management is very essential because it brings about increase in productivity, it involves making use of scientific method as well as job specialization among the employee to achieve common goal of the organization.
It should be noted that Classical viewpoint regards the organization as arrangements of interrelated parts that operate together to achieve a common
Answer: Participation
Explanation:
Participation financing is a firm of financing whereby a loan is shared by several parties because such loans are too huge and a party cannot take the loan alone.
Since we are informed that works for a life insurance company that funds commercial investment projects and often insures these projects by insisting on an equity position, this means that participation financing is being practiced.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
