Answer: the supply to increase as farmers plant more corn.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, quantity supply of a good is positively related to its price. When price of the good rises, producers will take advantage of the higher price by increasing supply. While, when price of the good falls, producers will supply less to the market.
Thus, when corn prices rise significantly and farmers expect the price of corn to continue rising relative to other crops, then we would expect the supply to increase as farmers plant more corn.
Answer:
B) is narrow and outdated.
Explanation:
The article's name is "Rethinking the 4 P’s" and it summarizes a 5 year study that involved more than 500 top level managers across the world. That study doesn't say that the 4 Ps are useless, it states that they are outdated. The study focused on the B2B market and it argues that the 4 Ps must be restated:
- S ⇒ products to solutions
- A ⇒ place to access
- V ⇒ price to value
- E ⇒ promotion to education
Question Completion:
Multiple Choice
:
a. Family Medical Leave Act
b. Americans with Disabilities Act
c. Pregnancy Discrimination Act
d. Age Discrimination in Employment Act
e. All of these answers are correct
Answer:
The law/regulation which applies to the benefits the company may utilize is:
a. Family Medical Leave Act
Explanation:
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, gives employees the opportunity to take leave from their work for specific family and medical reasons without affecting their normal annual leave. Unlike the other laws mentioned, which attempt to prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities, (Americans with Disabilities Act 1990), against Pregnancy (Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978), and against age (Age Discrimination in Employment Act 1967), the Family and Medical Leave Act provides benefits to employees.
Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer:
And he has reasons to be angry. The hotels usually are part of a large chain that can provide service for costumers to be happy in the given case that something like what you described happens. The hotel is not taking into account the interest and concerns of it's costumer and that will greatly affect the reputation the have.
Explanation:
When a company "Guarantee" a service or product is under the moral obligation to satisfy the costumer on the terms previously agreed on. Managers should be aware that failing to fix the problem will no doubt affect the perception of possible clients in the future.
