1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zepler [3.9K]
3 years ago
12

The Bureau of Transportation Statistics Omnibus Household Survey is conducted annually and serves as an information source for t

he U.S. Department of Transportation. In one part of the survey, the person being interviewed was asked to respond to the following statement: "Drivers of motor vehicles should be allowed to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving." Possible responses were strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, and strongly disagree. Forty-four respondents said that they strongly agree with this statement, 130 said that they somewhat agree, 165 said they somewhat disagree, and 741 said they strongly disagree with this statement.a. Do the responses for this statement provide categorical or quantitative data?b. Would it make more sense to use averages or percentages as a summary of the responses for this statement?c. What percentage of respondents strongly agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?d. Do the results indicate general support for or against allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?
Business
1 answer:
sasho [114]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a) For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

b) For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each

c) First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080 respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%

d) For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

\frac{1036}{44}=23.55

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

Explanation:

For this case we have the following data given:

Number of respondents that they strongly agree with the statement = 44

Number of respondents that they somewhat agree with the statement = 130

Number of respondents that they somewhat disagree agree with the statement = 165

Number of respondents that they strongly disagree agree with the statement = 741

Part a

Do the responses for this statement provide categorical or quantitative data?

For this case we have quantitative data since we have frequencies per each category.

Part b

Would it make more sense to use averages or percentages as a summary of the responses for this statement?

For this case is better use percentages since we have frequency counts per each category so then not makes sense calculate averages for this case.

Part c

What percentage of respondents strongly agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving?

First we need to calculate the total for the frequencies:

Total = 44+130+165+741= 1080 respondents

For this case we can calculate the percentage like this:

\% Strongly_{agree} = \frac{44}{1080} *100 =4.07\%

Part d

For this case the percentage of people who agree with allowing drivers of motor vehicles to talk on a hand-held cell phone while driving is just 4.07% and by the other hand the rest of the people correspond to 95.93%.

\frac{1036}{44}=23.55

The people who are NOT strongly agree is about 24 times greater than the peopl who strongly agrees.

So we can say that we don't have a general support for the claim.

You might be interested in
Juan, not a dealer in real property, sold land that he owned. His adjusted basis in the land was $700,000 and it was encumbered
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

45.45%

Explanation:

The total selling price was $200,000 (paid on the date of the sale) + $900,000 (note received) = $1,100,000

Juan's cost of he land = $700,000 (basis) - $100,000 (mortgage) = $600,000

Juan's profit = $1,100,000 - $600,000

Juan's gross profit percentage = $500,000 / $1,100,000 = 45.45%

6 0
3 years ago
Two siblings each pay 30% of their parents support so they can decide who will claim the parents with a multiple support agreemo
MrRa [10]
B: false
Hope this helps you
4 0
3 years ago
MM Proposition II with taxes: Group of answer choices explains how a firm's WACC increases with the use of financial leverage. r
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

explains how a firm's WACC increases with the use of financial leverage.

Explanation:

According to the MM Proposition II with taxes, the cost of equity rises with the increases use of debt in the capital structure of a firm.  

r_{e} = r_{o} +( r_{o}  - r_{d} ) × \frac{D}{E}

As cost of equity increases, the firm's WACC increases also

The  MM Proposition I with taxes reveals how utilizing the tax shield on debt causes an increase in the value of a firm

4 0
3 years ago
A region is in the middle of a very cold and snowy winter. As a result, hot chocolate has become more desirable, and many of the
Liula [17]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

As a result of the weather, the demand for chocolate increases. the demand curve shifts to the right. there is an increase in equilibrium price and quantity

As a result of the channels closing, the supply of imported cocoa falls. As a result, supply decreases. the supply curve shifts to the left

5 0
3 years ago
When economists speak of a deadweight​ loss, they are referring to?
nadezda [96]
Deadweight loss is a type of economic inefficiency when a good or service is not at its economic equilibrium (where supply equals demand). This loss may be experienced because of a tax or subsidy, or because of market power, such as a monopoly. Economists refer to deadweight loss when they want to show the negative effects of certain policy decisions that are less than optimal. 
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What percentage of the loan does PMI insure to protect the lender in case the borrower defaults on the loan?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following theories argues that organizations try to minimize their reliance on other organizations for the supply o
    6·2 answers
  • The management of River Corporation is considering the purchase of a new machine costing $380,000. The company's desired rate of
    15·1 answer
  • Under the equity method of accounting for investments, an investor recognizes its share of the earnings in the period in which t
    10·1 answer
  • Unrestricted current funds of a private university designated by the governing board for a specific future purpose should be rep
    6·1 answer
  • Match the following items.
    7·1 answer
  • Brendan buys a used car in April 2020 from his neighbor for $20,000. After one month, he loses his job and decides to sell the c
    7·1 answer
  • Cozelle, Inc., purchased inventory costing $125,000 and sold 80% of the goods for $200,000. All purchases and sales were on acco
    6·1 answer
  • As the attrition loss in a process increases, what happens to the yield?
    14·1 answer
  • The security that represents the residual ownership of a firm and has no priority in bankruptcy is called:________
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!