In the late 19th century, men, women, and children were working, with women and children receiving less pay than men. These people had to work in poor working conditions and low wages (women sometimes receiving six dollars a week).
You have lost the ability to use sustained attention.
-Mabel <3
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
the motives for mergers and acquisitions that apply to Charter’s acquisition of Time Warner Cable was that Charter wanted to consolidate ist big business to form a big conglomerated in the Industry of Mass Media Communications. The merger allowed Charter to increase its entertainment offer due to the fact that Time Warner already had a respectable and well-positioned place in the industry. The agreement was reached on May 26, 2015, in amicable terms.
We are referring to the book "Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities," written by Donald M. DePamphilis.
The statement given by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE. Intelligence quotient of individuals also changes with change in regions.
Intelligence is in the culture and customs followed by an individuals or group of individuals in a way that how the ancestors or super senior people have impacted the way of living.
<h3>Intelligence</h3>
- The intelligence of a person cannot be defined in exact numbers but is grouped from a range of being less intelligent to being very intelligent, and it cannot be seen but can be felt and experienced.
- Intelligence differs with changing cultures, which is dependent on factors like the upbringing of such person belonging to a specific culture and the teachings of life left behind by the ancestors.
- The individuals belonging to a culture have different intelligence because of the customs and traditions that have been set as standard practices and followed from such period.
Hence, the statement given above by Robert Sternberg which suggests that the intelligence is culturally defined is TRUE.
To know more about intelligence, click the link below.
brainly.com/question/9944825
the answer is: E. That the law was valid and did not discriminate against out-of-state wineries.
the state government could impose a regulation to limit or prohibit the sales of a certain type of product if that product impose some sort of harmful effect to the consumers. (Alcohols are included in this type of product)
The state cannot be considered to be discriminating out of state wineries because the state government does not have the jurisdiction to regulate businesses that were established outside its own state.
