Attachment and involvement in the social theory means the level of values that a person has in the society.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Social control hypothesis recommends that individuals' connections, duties, qualities, standards, and convictions urge them not to violate the law. In this way, if moral codes are disguised and people are integrated with and have a stake in their more extensive network, they will deliberately restrain their inclination to submit degenerate acts.
First, the elements of social control identified by Hirschi will be described. Hirschi's concept of "social bond" is comprised of the following four elements: (1) attachment, (2) commitment, (3) involvement, and (4) beliefs. Attachment refers to the symbiotic linkage between a person and society.
Answer:
puch your teacher in da face
Explanation:
u make her stipid tell her that yu is smarti
Answer:
A. Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.
C. Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.
Explanation:
M'Naghten Rule is an insanity defense used by defendant's attorney to plead defendant not guilty of crime due to mental conditions suffered during the time crime committed.
M'Naghten Rule states that a defendant will be pleaded not guilty only under conditions when it will be proved that the mental condition of defendant was not right at the time when crime was committed and that he/she was not able to discern his/her actions as right or wrong.
The criticism received to the M'Naghten rule is that it fails to distinguish between defendants who pose threat to the society and those who do not pose threat any longer. Another criticism is that it fails to distinguish between mental illness that are temporary or conditions which are lifelong.
Therefore, option A and C are correct.
(Hint: Students do not have a First Amendment right to make obscene speeches in school.)
Matthew N. Fraser, a student at Bethel High School, was suspended for three days for delivering an obscene and provocative speech to the student body. In this speech, he nominated his fellow classmate for an elected school office. The Supreme Court held that his free speech rights were not violated.
My general opinion was that they were very strict and they were living behind time.
