A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
(11/12) / (2 5/8) = ...turn mixed numbers to improper fractions
(11/12) / (21/8) = ...when dividing fractions, flip what u r dividing by, then multiply
11/12 * 8/21 = 88/252 reduces to 22/63
1. x = -4 ; f(x) = -(-4) = 4
2. x = -3 ; f(x) = 2(-3) + 1 = -5
3. x = 0 ; f(x) = 2(0) + 1 = 1
4. x = 2 ; f(x) = 2 + 3 = 5
5. x = 5 ; f(x) = 5 + 3 = 8
132 problems because...
there are six 30 minutes in 3 hours so you would multiply 22 with 6 to get 132
(22*6=132)
Answer:
105/5 i believe
Step-by-step explanation: